there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.Īn added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform.
Matte might be a desired quality for you, while glossy might be desired for someone else. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.Īs an example, one rating criteria for lipsticks is luster.
don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. Without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. On the pigmentation category a rating of four is a sign that evaluating "how pigmented is this product?" are mildy towards opaque.Īt blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. Looking at review rankings for the colour category an average total of five indicates replies to "does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?" generally suggest true to colour. Considering feedback for the long-wearing category the current rating of five suggests considering the question "how long-wearing is this product?" lean strongly towards stays all day. Feedback for the moisturizing category the rating of four suggests reviewers in response to the "how moisturizing is this product?" usually indicate hydrating. Reviewing the application category the current four suggests users & critics responses to "how did this product apply?" mainly suggest glides. Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews
0 kommentar(er)
